首页> 外文OA文献 >A microcosting study of microsurgery, LINAC radiosurgery, and gamma knife radiosurgery in meningioma patients
【2h】

A microcosting study of microsurgery, LINAC radiosurgery, and gamma knife radiosurgery in meningioma patients

机译:脑膜瘤患者显微外科手术,LINAC放射外科手术和伽玛刀放射外科手术的微成本研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

textabstractThe aim of the present study is to determine and compare initial treatment costs of microsurgery, linear accelerator (LINAC) radiosurgery, and gamma knife radiosurgery in meningioma patients. Additionally, the follow-up costs in the first year after initial treatment were assessed. Cost analyses were performed at two neurosurgical departments in The Netherlands from the healthcare providers' perspective. A total of 59 patients were included, of whom 18 underwent microsurgery, 15 underwent LINAC radiosurgery, and 26 underwent gamma knife radiosurgery. A standardized microcosting methodology was employed to ensure that the identified cost differences would reflect only actual cost differences. Initial treatment costs, using equipment costs per fraction, were €12,288 for microsurgery, €1,547 for LINAC radiosurgery, and €2,412 for gamma knife radiosurgery. Higher initial treatment costs for microsurgery were predominantly due to inpatient stay (€5,321) and indirect costs (€4,350). LINAC and gamma knife radiosurgery were equally expensive when equipment was valued per treatment (€2,198 and €2,412, respectively). Follow-up costs were slightly, but not significantly, higher for microsurgery compared with LINAC and gamma knife radiosurgery. Even though initial treatment costs were over five times higher for microsurgery compared with both radiosurgical treatments, our study gives indications that the relative cost difference may decrease when follow-up costs occurring during the first year after initial treatment are incorporated. This reinforces the need to consider follow-up costs after initial treatment when examining the relative costs of alternative treatments.
机译:本研究的目的是确定和比较脑膜瘤患者的显微外科手术,线性加速器(LINAC)放射外科手术和伽玛刀放射外科手术的初始治疗成本。此外,评估了初始治疗后第一年的随访费用。从医疗保健提供者的角度,费用分析是在荷兰的两个神经外科部门进行的。总共包括59例患者,其中18例接受了显微外科手术,15例接受了LINAC放射外科手术,26例接受了伽玛刀放射外科手术。采用了标准化的微成本核算方法,以确保所确定的成本差异仅反映实际成本差异。初期治疗费用(使用每部分设备的费用)是:显微外科手术为12,288欧元,LINAC放射外科为1,547欧元,伽马刀放射外科为2,412欧元。显微手术的初始治疗费用较高主要是由于住院天数(5,321欧元)和间接费用(4,350欧元)所致。当每次治疗对设备进行评估时,LINAC和伽马刀放射外科手术同样昂贵(分别为2,198欧元和2,412欧元)。与LINAC和伽马刀放射外科手术相比,显微外科手术的随访费用略高,但不明显。尽管显微外科手术的初始治疗费用比两种放射外科治疗高出五倍以上,但我们的研究表明,如果合并初始治疗后第一年发生的随访费用,相对费用差异可能会减少。这加强了在检查替代治疗的相对成本时,在初始治疗后需要考虑随访成本的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号